Construction, Engineering and Infrastructure Disputes
We advise on a wide range of construction, engineering and infrastructure disputes, for clients around the world.


Our team advises on disputes based on construction, engineering and PFI/PPP, including those that involve professional negligence. They act for contractors, architects, engineers, consultants, adjudicators and arbitrators – in Scotland, the UK and around the world. Those clients include some of the UK’s largest procurers and suppliers of construction services, across a range of sectors: energy, renewables, utilities, civil engineering, real estate, housing, schools and hospitals.

Our team has extensive experience in all forms of dispute resolution: litigation, adjudication, arbitration, mediation and expert determination, and dispute avoidance. We provide commercial and practical support, taking a forensic approach to complex cases. Our goal is to be trusted advisers, who clients know will help with any query they have.

Our experience includes disputes arising from:

  • Payment, quantum, loss and expense and variations
  • Delay, liquidated damages and extension of time claims
  • Defective works, including claims under the Building Safety Act 2022
  • Prescription and Limitation
  • The application and interpretation of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
  • Professional negligence claims
  • Procurement challenges

Meet our key contacts

David Anderson

Partner and Head of Property and Infrastructure Disputes


Contact by email

+44 (0)131 473 5102

+44 (0)787 665 8914

Connect on LinkedIn

Download vCard

Lisa Ambrus

Senior Associate

David Anderson

Partner and Head of Property and Infrastructure Disputes

Colin Archibald

Partner

Nathaniel Buckingham

Partner

Alejandro Coghill

Solicitor

Iain Drummond

Partner and Head of Commercial Disputes and Regulation

Leonore Dupont

Director

Gabriella Gilmour

Senior Solicitor

Kirsty Gray

Senior Solicitor

Leigh Herd

Partner

Frazer Meldrum

Solicitor

Ben Pilbrow

Partner

Francis Reynolds

Senior Associate

Alexandra Roobottom

Associate

Hayley Russell

Senior Solicitor

Philip Sewell

Partner

Ben Sheppard

Senior Associate

Sarah Walker

Director

Close


Related articles and insights: Construction, Engineering and Infrastructure Disputes

24 October 2025

Court rules it is just and equitable for building developers to be liable for cladding remediation costs

Contributors:
Iain Drummond, Alejandro Coghill

The Court of Appeal has affirmed that it is just and equitable to issue a remediation contribution order for cladding repairs against a building developer regardless of the availability of public funding. The retrospective nature of RCOs was also clarified in the decision.

22 October 2025

An adjudicator’s decision in two separate but substantially similar adjudications are both held by the court to be enforceable

Contributor: Leigh Herd

The courts have provided clarity around challenging an adjudicator’s decision on the grounds of both natural justice and jurisdiction.

16 October 2025

Residential occupier exception prevents enforcement of adjudicator’s decision

Contributor: Iain Drummond

The Technology and Construction Court has provided clarity regarding the validity of pay less notices, the residential occupier exception in the Construction Act and the ability to overturn adjudicators’ decisions on fees.

25 September 2025

An adjudicator’s decision may be invalidated if a false statement was made during the appointment process

Contributors:
Iain Drummond, Kirsty Gray

A recent decision by the Technology and Construction Court has clarified the consequences when a false statement is made during the process of appointing an adjudicator.

15 September 2025

Court rules settlement agreement was variation to original JCT contract and not standalone contract

Contributors:
Iain Drummond, Alejandro Coghill

The High Court in England has confirmed that a settlement agreement was a variation to the original JCT contract, allowing the adjudication provisions to be applied.

29 August 2025

Court mandates compulsory mediation despite no contractual obligation to do so

Contributor: Leigh Herd

The High Court in England’s recent decision in DKH Retail Ltd v City Football Group Ltd [2024] EWHC 3221 (Ch) suggested a change of attitude towards mandating compulsory mediation during judicial proceedings. The decision highlights the court’s willingness to actively encourage alternative dispute resolution and provides useful guidance in respect of commercial litigation strategy.

Contact us

David Anderson

Partner and Head of Property and Infrastructure Disputes


Contact by email

+44 (0)131 473 5102

+44 (0)787 665 8914

Connect on LinkedIn

Download vCard